Rye vs Tetoora Road
Property investment comparison - Rye, VIC 3941 vs Tetoora Road, VIC 3821
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Rye wins 3, Tetoora Road wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Rye | Tetoora Road |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $950K | $955K |
| Median unit price | $585K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.38% | 3.17% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.50% | - |
| 1-year house growth | -5.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -15.5% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 12.7% |
| Population | 9,438 | 93 |
Rye vs Tetoora Road: what the numbers say
The median house price is $950K in Rye and $955K in Tetoora Road, so Rye is the cheaper entry point, with Tetoora Road houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Rye leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.38%, compared with 3.17% in Tetoora Road, a gap of 0.21 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Rye and 12.7% in Tetoora Road, so landlords in Rye face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Rye is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,438 against 93, roughly 101 times the size of Tetoora Road; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Rye for rental income, Rye for a lower purchase price, Rye for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison