Rye vs Whroo
Property investment comparison - Rye, VIC 3941 vs Whroo, VIC 3612
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Rye wins 3, Whroo wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Rye | Whroo |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $950K | $955K |
| Median unit price | $585K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.38% | 2.54% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.50% | - |
| 1-year house growth | -5.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -15.5% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.7% | 2.4% |
| Population | 9,438 | 45 |
Rye vs Whroo: what the numbers say
The median house price is $950K in Rye and $955K in Whroo, so Rye is the cheaper entry point, with Whroo houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Rye leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.38%, compared with 2.54% in Whroo, a gap of 0.84 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Rye and 2.4% in Whroo, so landlords in Rye face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Rye is the bigger suburb, with a population of 9,438 against 45, roughly 210 times the size of Whroo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Rye for rental income, Rye for a lower purchase price, Rye for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison