Skip to main content

Scarborough vs Southport

Property investment comparison - Scarborough, QLD 4020 vs Southport, QLD 4215

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Scarborough wins 1, Southport wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricScarboroughSouthport
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price-$800K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.65%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.96%
1-year house growth+18.9%+12.9%
3-year house growth+32.1%+43.0%
Vacancy rate1.6%1.2%
Population9,17836,786

Scarborough vs Southport: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Scarborough and $1.2M in Southport, so Southport is the cheaper entry point.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.9% in Scarborough and +12.9% in Southport, so recent momentum favours Scarborough, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Scarborough houses are +32.1% and Southport houses +43.0%, so Southport has compounded faster than Scarborough over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Southport and 1.6% in Scarborough, so landlords in Southport face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Southport is the bigger suburb, with a population of 36,786 against 9,178, roughly 4.0 times the size of Scarborough; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Southport for a lower purchase price, Scarborough for recent price momentum, Southport for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison