Seabrook vs Tarrington
Property investment comparison - Seabrook, VIC 3028 vs Tarrington, VIC 3301
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Seabrook wins 3, Tarrington wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Seabrook | Tarrington |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $815K | $820K |
| Median unit price | - | $395K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.44% | 2.00% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.54% | 6.04% |
| 1-year house growth | +3.8%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.9% | 12.4% |
| Population | 4,952 | 328 |
Seabrook vs Tarrington: what the numbers say
The median house price is $815K in Seabrook and $820K in Tarrington, so Seabrook is the cheaper entry point, with Tarrington houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Seabrook leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.44%, compared with 2.00% in Tarrington, a gap of 1.44 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Seabrook and 12.4% in Tarrington, so landlords in Seabrook face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Seabrook is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,952 against 328, roughly 15 times the size of Tarrington; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Seabrook for rental income, Seabrook for a lower purchase price, Seabrook for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison