Skip to main content

Seabrook vs Waurn Ponds

Property investment comparison - Seabrook, VIC 3028 vs Waurn Ponds, VIC 3216

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Seabrook wins 1, Waurn Ponds wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricSeabrookWaurn Ponds
Median house price$815K$810K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.44%3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)4.54%-
1-year house growth+3.8%estimate+5.4%
3-year house growth--4.4%
Vacancy rate1.9%3.7%
Population4,9524,956

Seabrook vs Waurn Ponds: what the numbers say

The median house price is $815K in Seabrook and $810K in Waurn Ponds, so Waurn Ponds is the cheaper entry point, with Seabrook houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Waurn Ponds leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.80%, compared with 3.44% in Seabrook, a gap of 0.36 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.8% in Seabrook (an estimate) and +5.4% in Waurn Ponds, so recent momentum favours Waurn Ponds, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Seabrook and 3.7% in Waurn Ponds, so landlords in Seabrook face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Waurn Ponds is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,956 against 4,952, larger than Seabrook; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Waurn Ponds for rental income, Waurn Ponds for a lower purchase price, Waurn Ponds for recent price momentum, Seabrook for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison