Skip to main content

Seaspray vs Venus Bay

Property investment comparison - Seaspray, VIC 3851 vs Venus Bay, VIC 3956

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Seaspray wins 4, Venus Bay wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricSeasprayVenus Bay
Median house price$490K$490K
Median unit price$375K$495K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.96%4.33%
Gross rental yield (units)2.87%2.49%
1-year house growth+7.7%estimate+0.9%
3-year house growth--30.0%
Vacancy rate1.3%1.1%
Population373904

Seaspray vs Venus Bay: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $490K in Seaspray and $490K in Venus Bay.

For units, Seaspray sits at a median of $375K against $495K in Venus Bay, which makes Seaspray the more affordable unit market and Venus Bay the pricier one.

On cash flow, Seaspray leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.96%, compared with 4.33% in Venus Bay, a gap of 0.63 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.7% in Seaspray (an estimate) and +0.9% in Venus Bay, so recent momentum favours Seaspray, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Venus Bay and 1.3% in Seaspray, so landlords in Venus Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Venus Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 904 against 373, roughly 2.4 times the size of Seaspray; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Seaspray for rental income, Seaspray for recent price momentum, Venus Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison