Skip to main content

Sebastopol vs Timboon

Property investment comparison - Sebastopol, VIC 3356 vs Timboon, VIC 3268

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Sebastopol wins 6, Timboon wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricSebastopolTimboon
Median house price$510K$515K
Median unit price$395K$670K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.30%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.98%2.27%
1-year house growth+19.1%+5.7%
3-year house growth+11.0%+5.5%
Vacancy rate0.8%2.9%
Population10,1941,250

Sebastopol vs Timboon: what the numbers say

The median house price is $510K in Sebastopol and $515K in Timboon, so Sebastopol is the cheaper entry point, with Timboon houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Sebastopol sits at a median of $395K against $670K in Timboon, which makes Sebastopol the more affordable unit market and Timboon the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.1% in Sebastopol and +5.7% in Timboon, so recent momentum favours Sebastopol, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Sebastopol houses are +11.0% and Timboon houses +5.5%, so Sebastopol has compounded faster than Timboon over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Sebastopol and 2.9% in Timboon, so landlords in Sebastopol face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Sebastopol is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,194 against 1,250, roughly 8 times the size of Timboon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sebastopol for a lower purchase price, Sebastopol for recent price momentum, Sebastopol for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison