Seymour vs St Marys
Property investment comparison - Seymour, TAS 7215 vs St Marys, TAS 7215
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Seymour wins 1, St Marys wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Seymour | St Marys |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $425K | $400K |
| Median unit price | - | $455K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 6.41% | 4.99% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 3.44% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +7.7%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.6% | 1.2% |
| Population | 31 | 738 |
Seymour vs St Marys: what the numbers say
The median house price is $425K in Seymour and $400K in St Marys, so St Marys is the cheaper entry point, with Seymour houses about 6% dearer.
On cash flow, Seymour leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 6.41%, compared with 4.99% in St Marys, a gap of 1.42 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in St Marys and 2.6% in Seymour, so landlords in St Marys face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
St Marys is the bigger suburb, with a population of 738 against 31, roughly 24 times the size of Seymour; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Seymour for rental income, St Marys for a lower purchase price, St Marys for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison