Seymour vs Woodside Beach
Property investment comparison - Seymour, VIC 3660 vs Woodside Beach, VIC 3874
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Seymour wins 2, Woodside Beach wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Seymour | Woodside Beach |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $460K | $470K |
| Median unit price | $295K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 5.05% | 4.59% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 6.52% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +3.9% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.2% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | - |
| Population | 6,569 | 114 |
Seymour vs Woodside Beach: what the numbers say
The median house price is $460K in Seymour and $470K in Woodside Beach, so Seymour is the cheaper entry point, with Woodside Beach houses about 2% dearer.
On cash flow, Seymour leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.05%, compared with 4.59% in Woodside Beach, a gap of 0.46 percentage points.
Seymour is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,569 against 114, roughly 58 times the size of Woodside Beach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Seymour for rental income, Seymour for a lower purchase price. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Woodside Beach, VIC 3874
Open Woodside Beach suburb profileRecent sales in Woodside Beach
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison