Skip to main content

Sheffield vs Upper Burnie

Property investment comparison - Sheffield, TAS 7306 vs Upper Burnie, TAS 7320

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Sheffield wins 1, Upper Burnie wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricSheffieldUpper Burnie
Median house price$520K$515K
Median unit price-$350K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.55%4.60%
Gross rental yield (units)4.22%4.80%
1-year house growth+0.0%+15.2%estimate
3-year house growth+16.2%-
Vacancy rate1.0%1.2%
Population1,6021,891

Sheffield vs Upper Burnie: what the numbers say

The median house price is $520K in Sheffield and $515K in Upper Burnie, so Upper Burnie is the cheaper entry point, with Sheffield houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.55% in Sheffield and 4.60% in Upper Burnie, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +0.0% in Sheffield and +15.2% in Upper Burnie (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Upper Burnie, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Sheffield and 1.2% in Upper Burnie, so landlords in Sheffield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Upper Burnie is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,891 against 1,602, larger than Sheffield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Upper Burnie for a lower purchase price, Upper Burnie for recent price momentum, Sheffield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison