Skip to main content

Shoreham vs Surrey Hills

Property investment comparison - Shoreham, VIC 3916 vs Surrey Hills, VIC 3127

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Shoreham wins 4, Surrey Hills wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricShorehamSurrey Hills
Median house price$2.1M$2.2M
Median unit price$795K$900K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.23%
Gross rental yield (units)2.69%3.94%
1-year house growth+0.6%estimate-6.5%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.9%2.6%
Population67913,655

Shoreham vs Surrey Hills: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.1M in Shoreham and $2.2M in Surrey Hills, so Shoreham is the cheaper entry point, with Surrey Hills houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Shoreham sits at a median of $795K against $900K in Surrey Hills, which makes Shoreham the more affordable unit market and Surrey Hills the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +0.6% in Shoreham (an estimate) and -6.5% in Surrey Hills (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Shoreham, while Surrey Hills went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Shoreham and 2.6% in Surrey Hills, so landlords in Shoreham face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Surrey Hills is the bigger suburb, with a population of 13,655 against 679, roughly 20 times the size of Shoreham; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Shoreham for a lower purchase price, Shoreham for recent price momentum, Shoreham for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison