Skip to main content

Sorrento vs South Fremantle

Property investment comparison - Sorrento, WA 6020 vs South Fremantle, WA 6162

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Sorrento wins 3, South Fremantle wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricSorrentoSouth Fremantle
Median house price$2M$2M
Median unit price$730K$850K
Gross rental yield (houses)-2.52%
Gross rental yield (units)-4.95%
1-year house growth+22.7%+10.0%
3-year house growth+42.3%+33.4%
Vacancy rate0.7%0.3%
Population7,7953,398

Sorrento vs South Fremantle: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2M in Sorrento and $2M in South Fremantle.

For units, Sorrento sits at a median of $730K against $850K in South Fremantle, which makes Sorrento the more affordable unit market and South Fremantle the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +22.7% in Sorrento and +10.0% in South Fremantle, so recent momentum favours Sorrento, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Sorrento houses are +42.3% and South Fremantle houses +33.4%, so Sorrento has compounded faster than South Fremantle over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in South Fremantle and 0.7% in Sorrento, so landlords in South Fremantle face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Sorrento is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,795 against 3,398, roughly 2.3 times the size of South Fremantle; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sorrento for recent price momentum, South Fremantle for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison