Skip to main content

Southport vs Tingalpa

Property investment comparison - Southport, QLD 4215 vs Tingalpa, QLD 4173

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Southport wins 3, Tingalpa wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricSouthportTingalpa
Median house price$1.2M$1.2M
Median unit price$800K$815K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.65%3.30%
Gross rental yield (units)4.96%-
1-year house growth+12.9%+12.8%estimate
3-year house growth+43.0%-
Vacancy rate1.2%1.0%
Population36,7868,461

Southport vs Tingalpa: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.2M in Southport and $1.2M in Tingalpa, so Tingalpa is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Southport sits at a median of $800K against $815K in Tingalpa, which makes Southport the more affordable unit market and Tingalpa the pricier one.

On cash flow, Southport leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.65%, compared with 3.30% in Tingalpa, a gap of 0.35 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.9% in Southport and +12.8% in Tingalpa (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Southport, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Tingalpa and 1.2% in Southport, so landlords in Tingalpa face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Southport is the bigger suburb, with a population of 36,786 against 8,461, roughly 4.3 times the size of Tingalpa; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Southport for rental income, Tingalpa for a lower purchase price, Southport for recent price momentum, Tingalpa for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison