Skip to main content

Spring Mountain vs Wondunna

Property investment comparison - Spring Mountain, QLD 4300 vs Wondunna, QLD 4655

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Spring Mountain wins 2, Wondunna wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricSpring MountainWondunna
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.50%3.61%
Gross rental yield (units)3.42%-
1-year house growth+18.8%+14.8%estimate
3-year house growth+37.9%-
Vacancy rate0.8%6.0%
Population6,0853,315

Spring Mountain vs Wondunna: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $1.0M in Spring Mountain and $1.0M in Wondunna.

On cash flow, Wondunna leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.61%, compared with 3.50% in Spring Mountain, a gap of 0.11 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +18.8% in Spring Mountain and +14.8% in Wondunna (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Spring Mountain, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Spring Mountain and 6.0% in Wondunna, so landlords in Spring Mountain face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Spring Mountain is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,085 against 3,315, larger than Wondunna; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wondunna for rental income, Spring Mountain for recent price momentum, Spring Mountain for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison