Stanwell Park vs Wombarra
Property investment comparison - Stanwell Park, NSW 2508 vs Wombarra, NSW 2515
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Stanwell Park wins 1, Wombarra wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Stanwell Park | Wombarra |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.2M | $2.2M |
| Median unit price | - | $1.1M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.47% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 3.51% | 4.54% |
| 1-year house growth | +9.4%estimate | +0.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 2.5% | 1.3% |
| Population | 1,532 | 944 |
Stanwell Park vs Wombarra: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2.2M in Stanwell Park and $2.2M in Wombarra.
Over the past year house prices moved +9.4% in Stanwell Park (an estimate) and +0.2% in Wombarra (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Stanwell Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Wombarra and 2.5% in Stanwell Park, so landlords in Wombarra face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Stanwell Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,532 against 944, larger than Wombarra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Stanwell Park for recent price momentum, Wombarra for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison