Skip to main content

Steiglitz vs Taylors Lakes

Property investment comparison - Steiglitz, VIC 3331 vs Taylors Lakes, VIC 3038

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Steiglitz wins 3, Taylors Lakes wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricSteiglitzTaylors Lakes
Median house price$990K$990K
Median unit price$370K$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.72%3.15%
Gross rental yield (units)6.10%4.49%
1-year house growth-+8.3%
3-year house growth-+7.4%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.5%
Population6115,174

Steiglitz vs Taylors Lakes: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $990K in Steiglitz and $990K in Taylors Lakes.

For units, Steiglitz sits at a median of $370K against $625K in Taylors Lakes, which makes Steiglitz the more affordable unit market and Taylors Lakes the pricier one.

On cash flow, Taylors Lakes leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.15%, compared with 2.72% in Steiglitz, a gap of 0.43 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Steiglitz and 1.5% in Taylors Lakes, so landlords in Steiglitz face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Taylors Lakes is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,174 against 61, roughly 249 times the size of Steiglitz; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Taylors Lakes for rental income, Steiglitz for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison