Stewarton vs Wallan
Property investment comparison - Stewarton, VIC 3725 vs Wallan, VIC 3756
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Stewarton wins 0, Wallan wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Stewarton | Wallan |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $620K | $620K |
| Median unit price | - | $465K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 4.00% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.77% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +0.0% |
| 3-year house growth | - | -0.8% |
| Vacancy rate | 15.1% | 2.1% |
| Population | 118 | 15,004 |
Stewarton vs Wallan: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $620K in Stewarton and $620K in Wallan.
Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Wallan and 15.1% in Stewarton, so landlords in Wallan face less competition for tenants.
Wallan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,004 against 118, roughly 127 times the size of Stewarton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wallan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison