Stoneleigh vs Wangaratta
Property investment comparison - Stoneleigh, VIC 3373 vs Wangaratta, VIC 3677
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Stoneleigh wins 1, Wangaratta wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Stoneleigh | Wangaratta |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $570K | $565K |
| Median unit price | - | $400K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.59% | 4.90% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 5.30% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +7.6% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +9.0% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.8% | 0.8% |
| Population | 45 | 19,214 |
Stoneleigh vs Wangaratta: what the numbers say
The median house price is $570K in Stoneleigh and $565K in Wangaratta, so Wangaratta is the cheaper entry point, with Stoneleigh houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Wangaratta leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.90%, compared with 3.59% in Stoneleigh, a gap of 1.31 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Stoneleigh and 0.8% in Wangaratta, so landlords in Stoneleigh face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Wangaratta is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,214 against 45, roughly 427 times the size of Stoneleigh; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wangaratta for rental income, Wangaratta for a lower purchase price, Stoneleigh for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison