Skip to main content

Stratford vs West Point

Property investment comparison - Stratford, QLD 4870 vs West Point, QLD 4819

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Stratford wins 2, West Point wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricStratfordWest Point
Median house price$955K$950K
Median unit price$490K$295K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.45%2.91%
Gross rental yield (units)-7.92%
1-year house growth+14.1%-
3-year house growth+36.8%-
Vacancy rate0.5%0.6%
Population1,19832

Stratford vs West Point: what the numbers say

The median house price is $955K in Stratford and $950K in West Point, so West Point is the cheaper entry point, with Stratford houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Stratford sits at a median of $490K against $295K in West Point, which makes West Point the more affordable unit market and Stratford the pricier one.

On cash flow, Stratford leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.45%, compared with 2.91% in West Point, a gap of 1.54 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.5% in Stratford and 0.6% in West Point, so landlords in Stratford face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Stratford is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,198 against 32, roughly 37 times the size of West Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Stratford for rental income, West Point for a lower purchase price, Stratford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison