Skip to main content

Strathfield South vs Zetland

Property investment comparison - Strathfield South, NSW 2136 vs Zetland, NSW 2017

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Strathfield South wins 2, Zetland wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricStrathfield SouthZetland
Median house price$2.3M$2.3M
Median unit price$725K$980K
Gross rental yield (houses)-3.25%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.84%
1-year house growth+0.6%estimate+22.7%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.1%2.5%
Population3,63612,622

Strathfield South vs Zetland: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $2.3M in Strathfield South and $2.3M in Zetland.

For units, Strathfield South sits at a median of $725K against $980K in Zetland, which makes Strathfield South the more affordable unit market and Zetland the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +0.6% in Strathfield South (an estimate) and +22.7% in Zetland (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Zetland, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Strathfield South and 2.5% in Zetland, so landlords in Strathfield South face less competition for tenants.

Zetland is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,622 against 3,636, roughly 3.5 times the size of Strathfield South; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Zetland for recent price momentum, Strathfield South for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison