Skip to main content

Strathmore vs Thornbury

Property investment comparison - Strathmore, VIC 3041 vs Thornbury, VIC 3071

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Strathmore wins 0, Thornbury wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricStrathmoreThornbury
Median house price$1.5M$1.5M
Median unit price-$715K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.73%2.81%
Gross rental yield (units)4.40%4.55%
1-year house growth-5.5%estimate+3.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate2.8%1.4%
Population8,98019,005

Strathmore vs Thornbury: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.5M in Strathmore and $1.5M in Thornbury, so Thornbury is the cheaper entry point, with Strathmore houses about 2% dearer.

On cash flow, Thornbury leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 2.81%, compared with 2.73% in Strathmore, a gap of 0.08 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -5.5% in Strathmore (an estimate) and +3.8% in Thornbury (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Thornbury, while Strathmore went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Thornbury and 2.8% in Strathmore, so landlords in Thornbury face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Thornbury is the bigger suburb, with a population of 19,005 against 8,980, roughly 2.1 times the size of Strathmore; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Thornbury for rental income, Thornbury for a lower purchase price, Thornbury for recent price momentum, Thornbury for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison