Skip to main content

Stuarts Point vs Tolland

Property investment comparison - Stuarts Point, NSW 2441 vs Tolland, NSW 2650

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Stuarts Point wins 1, Tolland wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricStuarts PointTolland
Median house price$625K$625K
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)4.07%4.19%
Gross rental yield (units)4.02%-
1-year house growth+2.6%+19.9%estimate
3-year house growth+11.8%-
Vacancy rate1.4%2.4%
Population7663,459

Stuarts Point vs Tolland: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $625K in Stuarts Point and $625K in Tolland.

On cash flow, Tolland leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.19%, compared with 4.07% in Stuarts Point, a gap of 0.12 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.6% in Stuarts Point and +19.9% in Tolland (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Tolland, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Stuarts Point and 2.4% in Tolland, so landlords in Stuarts Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tolland is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,459 against 766, roughly 4.5 times the size of Stuarts Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tolland for rental income, Tolland for recent price momentum, Stuarts Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison