Sunnyside vs Warrane
Property investment comparison - Sunnyside, TAS 7305 vs Warrane, TAS 7018
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Sunnyside wins 1, Warrane wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Sunnyside | Warrane |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $645K | $650K |
| Median unit price | - | $570K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.60% | 4.60% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.70% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +18.0% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +7.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 3.0% | 1.0% |
| Population | 110 | 2,695 |
Sunnyside vs Warrane: what the numbers say
The median house price is $645K in Sunnyside and $650K in Warrane, so Sunnyside is the cheaper entry point, with Warrane houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Warrane leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.60%, compared with 3.60% in Sunnyside, a gap of 1.00 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.0% in Warrane and 3.0% in Sunnyside, so landlords in Warrane face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Warrane is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,695 against 110, roughly 25 times the size of Sunnyside; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Warrane for rental income, Sunnyside for a lower purchase price, Warrane for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison