Skip to main content

Surfers Beach vs The Oaks

Property investment comparison - Surfers Beach, NSW 2533 vs The Oaks, NSW 2570

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Surfers Beach wins 3, The Oaks wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricSurfers BeachThe Oaks
Median house price$1.4M$1.4M
Median unit price$845K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.13%2.50%
Gross rental yield (units)4.14%3.80%
1-year house growth+7.0%+10.2%
3-year house growth-+33.9%
Vacancy rate2.0%2.2%
Population7,8092,982

Surfers Beach vs The Oaks: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.4M in Surfers Beach and $1.4M in The Oaks, so The Oaks is the cheaper entry point, with Surfers Beach houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Surfers Beach leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.13%, compared with 2.50% in The Oaks, a gap of 0.63 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +7.0% in Surfers Beach and +10.2% in The Oaks, so recent momentum favours The Oaks, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Surfers Beach and 2.2% in The Oaks, so landlords in Surfers Beach face less competition for tenants.

Surfers Beach is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,809 against 2,982, roughly 2.6 times the size of The Oaks; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Surfers Beach for rental income, The Oaks for a lower purchase price, The Oaks for recent price momentum, Surfers Beach for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison