Skip to main content

Sussex Inlet vs Turvey Park

Property investment comparison - Sussex Inlet, NSW 2540 vs Turvey Park, NSW 2650

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Sussex Inlet wins 1, Turvey Park wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricSussex InletTurvey Park
Median house price$780K$780K
Median unit price$625K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.83%3.98%
Gross rental yield (units)4.10%3.54%
1-year house growth+2.7%+15.6%estimate
3-year house growth+6.6%-
Vacancy rate3.1%1.1%
Population3,8883,572

Sussex Inlet vs Turvey Park: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $780K in Sussex Inlet and $780K in Turvey Park.

On cash flow, Turvey Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.83% in Sussex Inlet, a gap of 0.15 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +2.7% in Sussex Inlet and +15.6% in Turvey Park (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Turvey Park, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Turvey Park and 3.1% in Sussex Inlet, so landlords in Turvey Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Sussex Inlet is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,888 against 3,572, larger than Turvey Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Turvey Park for rental income, Turvey Park for recent price momentum, Turvey Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison