Table Cape vs Trevallyn
Property investment comparison - Table Cape, TAS 7325 vs Trevallyn, TAS 7250
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Table Cape wins 1, Trevallyn wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Table Cape | Trevallyn |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $710K | $700K |
| Median unit price | $445K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.21% | 4.23% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.68% | 4.65% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +13.1%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 3.2% | 2.5% |
| Population | 87 | 4,826 |
Table Cape vs Trevallyn: what the numbers say
The median house price is $710K in Table Cape and $700K in Trevallyn, so Trevallyn is the cheaper entry point, with Table Cape houses about 1% dearer.
On cash flow, Trevallyn leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.23%, compared with 3.21% in Table Cape, a gap of 1.02 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.5% in Trevallyn and 3.2% in Table Cape, so landlords in Trevallyn face less competition for tenants.
Trevallyn is the bigger suburb, with a population of 4,826 against 87, roughly 55 times the size of Table Cape; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Trevallyn for rental income, Trevallyn for a lower purchase price, Trevallyn for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison