Tabor vs Werribee
Property investment comparison - Tabor, VIC 3289 vs Werribee, VIC 3030
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Tabor wins 2, Werribee wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Tabor | Werribee |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $675K | $675K |
| Median unit price | - | $475K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.77% | 3.70% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 4.45% |
| 1-year house growth | - | +9.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.2% | 2.4% |
| Population | 38 | 50,027 |
Tabor vs Werribee: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $675K in Tabor and $675K in Werribee.
On cash flow, Tabor leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.77%, compared with 3.70% in Werribee, a gap of 1.07 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Tabor and 2.4% in Werribee, so landlords in Tabor face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Werribee is the bigger suburb, with a population of 50,027 against 38, roughly 1317 times the size of Tabor; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tabor for rental income, Tabor for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison