Tallawong vs Wattle Grove
Property investment comparison - Tallawong, NSW 2762 vs Wattle Grove, NSW 2173
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Tallawong wins 1, Wattle Grove wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Tallawong | Wattle Grove |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.4M | $1.4M |
| Median unit price | $635K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.98% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.52% | 4.02% |
| 1-year house growth | +5.3%estimate | +6.3% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +24.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 3.6% | 1.2% |
| Population | 6,570 | 8,886 |
Tallawong vs Wattle Grove: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.4M in Tallawong and $1.4M in Wattle Grove, so Wattle Grove is the cheaper entry point.
Over the past year house prices moved +5.3% in Tallawong (an estimate) and +6.3% in Wattle Grove, so recent momentum favours Wattle Grove, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Wattle Grove and 3.6% in Tallawong, so landlords in Wattle Grove face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Wattle Grove is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,886 against 6,570, larger than Tallawong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wattle Grove for a lower purchase price, Wattle Grove for recent price momentum, Wattle Grove for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison