Tallawong vs West Hoxton
Property investment comparison - Tallawong, NSW 2762 vs West Hoxton, NSW 2171
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Tallawong wins 1, West Hoxton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Tallawong | West Hoxton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1.4M | $1.4M |
| Median unit price | $635K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 3.28% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.52% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +5.3%estimate | +8.3% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +18.9% |
| Vacancy rate | 3.6% | 2.4% |
| Population | 6,570 | 10,152 |
Tallawong vs West Hoxton: what the numbers say
The median house price is $1.4M in Tallawong and $1.4M in West Hoxton, so Tallawong is the cheaper entry point.
Over the past year house prices moved +5.3% in Tallawong (an estimate) and +8.3% in West Hoxton, so recent momentum favours West Hoxton, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 2.4% in West Hoxton and 3.6% in Tallawong, so landlords in West Hoxton face less competition for tenants.
West Hoxton is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,152 against 6,570, larger than Tallawong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tallawong for a lower purchase price, West Hoxton for recent price momentum, West Hoxton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison