Skip to main content

Tallebudgera vs Wights Mountain

Property investment comparison - Tallebudgera, QLD 4228 vs Wights Mountain, QLD 4520

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Tallebudgera wins 2, Wights Mountain wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricTallebudgeraWights Mountain
Median house price$2.2M$2.2M
Median unit price$985K$675K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.20%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.14%4.93%
1-year house growth+13.0%estimate+6.0%
3-year house growth-+27.3%
Vacancy rate2.1%1.8%
Population3,826767

Tallebudgera vs Wights Mountain: what the numbers say

The median house price is $2.2M in Tallebudgera and $2.2M in Wights Mountain, so Tallebudgera is the cheaper entry point.

For units, Tallebudgera sits at a median of $985K against $675K in Wights Mountain, which makes Wights Mountain the more affordable unit market and Tallebudgera the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +13.0% in Tallebudgera (an estimate) and +6.0% in Wights Mountain, so recent momentum favours Tallebudgera, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Wights Mountain and 2.1% in Tallebudgera, so landlords in Wights Mountain face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tallebudgera is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,826 against 767, roughly 5.0 times the size of Wights Mountain; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tallebudgera for a lower purchase price, Tallebudgera for recent price momentum, Wights Mountain for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison