Skip to main content

Tanilba Bay vs Worrowing Heights

Property investment comparison - Tanilba Bay, NSW 2319 vs Worrowing Heights, NSW 2540

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Tanilba Bay wins 4, Worrowing Heights wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricTanilba BayWorrowing Heights
Median house price$815K$820K
Median unit price-$625K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.02%3.98%
Gross rental yield (units)3.95%3.79%
1-year house growth+5.3%-
3-year house growth+9.1%-
Vacancy rate1.3%2.4%
Population3,237713

Tanilba Bay vs Worrowing Heights: what the numbers say

The median house price is $815K in Tanilba Bay and $820K in Worrowing Heights, so Tanilba Bay is the cheaper entry point, with Worrowing Heights houses about 1% dearer.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.02% in Tanilba Bay and 3.98% in Worrowing Heights, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Tanilba Bay and 2.4% in Worrowing Heights, so landlords in Tanilba Bay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tanilba Bay is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,237 against 713, roughly 4.5 times the size of Worrowing Heights; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tanilba Bay for a lower purchase price, Tanilba Bay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison