Skip to main content

Taringa vs Willawong

Property investment comparison - Taringa, QLD 4068 vs Willawong, QLD 4110

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Taringa wins 1, Willawong wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricTaringaWillawong
Median house price$1.8M$1.8M
Median unit price$845K$460K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.47%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.03%5.07%
1-year house growth+4.3%estimate+8.1%
3-year house growth-+62.7%
Vacancy rate1.9%0.8%
Population8,732145

Taringa vs Willawong: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.8M in Taringa and $1.8M in Willawong, so Taringa is the cheaper entry point, with Willawong houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Taringa sits at a median of $845K against $460K in Willawong, which makes Willawong the more affordable unit market and Taringa the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +4.3% in Taringa (an estimate) and +8.1% in Willawong, so recent momentum favours Willawong, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Willawong and 1.9% in Taringa, so landlords in Willawong face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Taringa is the bigger suburb, with a population of 8,732 against 145, roughly 60 times the size of Willawong; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Taringa for a lower purchase price, Willawong for recent price momentum, Willawong for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison