Taromeo vs Yorkeys Knob
Property investment comparison - Taromeo, QLD 4314 vs Yorkeys Knob, QLD 4878
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Taromeo wins 0, Yorkeys Knob wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Taromeo | Yorkeys Knob |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $670K | $670K |
| Median unit price | - | $470K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.45% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 6.05% |
| 1-year house growth | +12.1%estimate | +14.1%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.4% | 0.8% |
| Population | 373 | 2,794 |
Taromeo vs Yorkeys Knob: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $670K in Taromeo and $670K in Yorkeys Knob.
Over the past year house prices moved +12.1% in Taromeo (an estimate) and +14.1% in Yorkeys Knob (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Yorkeys Knob, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Yorkeys Knob and 1.4% in Taromeo, so landlords in Yorkeys Knob face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Yorkeys Knob is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,794 against 373, roughly 7 times the size of Taromeo; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Yorkeys Knob for recent price momentum, Yorkeys Knob for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison