Skip to main content

Tarrington vs Whittlesea

Property investment comparison - Tarrington, VIC 3301 vs Whittlesea, VIC 3757

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Tarrington wins 2, Whittlesea wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricTarringtonWhittlesea
Median house price$820K$820K
Median unit price$395K$455K
Gross rental yield (houses)2.00%3.86%
Gross rental yield (units)6.04%5.10%
1-year house growth-+5.1%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate12.4%1.3%
Population3286,117

Tarrington vs Whittlesea: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $820K in Tarrington and $820K in Whittlesea.

For units, Tarrington sits at a median of $395K against $455K in Whittlesea, which makes Tarrington the more affordable unit market and Whittlesea the pricier one.

On cash flow, Whittlesea leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.86%, compared with 2.00% in Tarrington, a gap of 1.86 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.3% in Whittlesea and 12.4% in Tarrington, so landlords in Whittlesea face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Whittlesea is the bigger suburb, with a population of 6,117 against 328, roughly 19 times the size of Tarrington; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Whittlesea for rental income, Whittlesea for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison