Skip to main content

Tascott vs Tumbi Umbi

Property investment comparison - Tascott, NSW 2250 vs Tumbi Umbi, NSW 2261

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Tascott wins 3, Tumbi Umbi wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricTascottTumbi Umbi
Median house price$1.0M$1.0M
Median unit price--
Gross rental yield (houses)3.90%3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)5.34%4.23%
1-year house growth+6.2%+6.2%
3-year house growth+7.4%+18.4%
Vacancy rate1.9%0.4%
Population1,6755,369

Tascott vs Tumbi Umbi: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.0M in Tascott and $1.0M in Tumbi Umbi, so Tascott is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Tascott leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.90%, compared with 3.80% in Tumbi Umbi, a gap of 0.10 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +6.2% in both suburbs.

Looking back three years, Tascott houses are +7.4% and Tumbi Umbi houses +18.4%, so Tumbi Umbi has compounded faster than Tascott over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Tumbi Umbi and 1.9% in Tascott, so landlords in Tumbi Umbi face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tumbi Umbi is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,369 against 1,675, roughly 3.2 times the size of Tascott; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tascott for rental income, Tascott for a lower purchase price, Tumbi Umbi for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison