Skip to main content

Taylors Lakes vs Tremont

Property investment comparison - Taylors Lakes, VIC 3038 vs Tremont, VIC 3785

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Taylors Lakes wins 1, Tremont wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricTaylors LakesTremont
Median house price$990K$990K
Median unit price$625K$490K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.15%4.08%
Gross rental yield (units)4.49%2.99%
1-year house growth+8.3%-
3-year house growth+7.4%-
Vacancy rate1.5%1.1%
Population15,17469

Taylors Lakes vs Tremont: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $990K in Taylors Lakes and $990K in Tremont.

For units, Taylors Lakes sits at a median of $625K against $490K in Tremont, which makes Tremont the more affordable unit market and Taylors Lakes the pricier one.

On cash flow, Tremont leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.08%, compared with 3.15% in Taylors Lakes, a gap of 0.93 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Tremont and 1.5% in Taylors Lakes, so landlords in Tremont face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Taylors Lakes is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,174 against 69, roughly 220 times the size of Tremont; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tremont for rental income, Tremont for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison