Tennyson vs Wattle Park
Property investment comparison - Tennyson, SA 5022 vs Wattle Park, SA 5066
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Tennyson wins 1, Wattle Park wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Tennyson | Wattle Park |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2.7M | $1.9M |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.54% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | - | 2.54% |
| 1-year house growth | +10.8%estimate | +8.5% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +53.7% |
| Vacancy rate | 3.8% | 1.2% |
| Population | 1,137 | 1,885 |
Tennyson vs Wattle Park: what the numbers say
The median house price is $2.7M in Tennyson and $1.9M in Wattle Park, so Wattle Park is the cheaper entry point, with Tennyson houses about 41% dearer.
Over the past year house prices moved +10.8% in Tennyson (an estimate) and +8.5% in Wattle Park, so recent momentum favours Tennyson, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 1.2% in Wattle Park and 3.8% in Tennyson, so landlords in Wattle Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Wattle Park is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,885 against 1,137, larger than Tennyson; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Wattle Park for a lower purchase price, Tennyson for recent price momentum, Wattle Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison