Theresa Park vs Warrawee
Property investment comparison - Theresa Park, NSW 2570 vs Warrawee, NSW 2074
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Theresa Park wins 2, Warrawee wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Theresa Park | Warrawee |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $3.4M | $3.5M |
| Median unit price | $720K | $935K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | - | 2.44% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.02% | - |
| 1-year house growth | - | -5.2%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 3.8% | 2.0% |
| Population | 600 | 3,170 |
Theresa Park vs Warrawee: what the numbers say
The median house price is $3.4M in Theresa Park and $3.5M in Warrawee, so Theresa Park is the cheaper entry point, with Warrawee houses about 1% dearer.
For units, Theresa Park sits at a median of $720K against $935K in Warrawee, which makes Theresa Park the more affordable unit market and Warrawee the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 2.0% in Warrawee and 3.8% in Theresa Park, so landlords in Warrawee face less competition for tenants.
Warrawee is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,170 against 600, roughly 5 times the size of Theresa Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Theresa Park for a lower purchase price, Warrawee for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison