Skip to main content

Thorneside vs Virginia

Property investment comparison - Thorneside, QLD 4158 vs Virginia, QLD 4014

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Thorneside wins 4, Virginia wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricThornesideVirginia
Median house price$1.3M$1.3M
Median unit price$780K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.10%2.85%
Gross rental yield (units)3.76%2.86%
1-year house growth+11.4%+14.1%
3-year house growth+50.0%+48.0%
Vacancy rate0.8%0.8%
Population3,8772,395

Thorneside vs Virginia: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.3M in Thorneside and $1.3M in Virginia, so Thorneside is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Thorneside leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.10%, compared with 2.85% in Virginia, a gap of 0.25 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +11.4% in Thorneside and +14.1% in Virginia, so recent momentum favours Virginia, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Thorneside houses are +50.0% and Virginia houses +48.0%, so Thorneside has compounded faster than Virginia over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.8%.

Thorneside is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,877 against 2,395, larger than Virginia; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Thorneside for rental income, Thorneside for a lower purchase price, Virginia for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison