Skip to main content

Tinonee vs Wallerawang

Property investment comparison - Tinonee, NSW 2429 vs Wallerawang, NSW 2845

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Tinonee wins 3, Wallerawang wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricTinoneeWallerawang
Median house price$560K$560K
Median unit price$345K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.81%4.60%
Gross rental yield (units)4.85%3.54%
1-year house growth-18.2%estimate+7.7%
3-year house growth+100.0%+13.1%
Vacancy rate1.6%0.3%
Population1,2022,019

Tinonee vs Wallerawang: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $560K in Tinonee and $560K in Wallerawang.

On cash flow, Tinonee leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.81%, compared with 4.60% in Wallerawang, a gap of 0.21 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved -18.2% in Tinonee (an estimate) and +7.7% in Wallerawang, so recent momentum favours Wallerawang, while Tinonee went backwards.

Looking back three years, Tinonee houses are +100.0% and Wallerawang houses +13.1%, so Tinonee has compounded faster than Wallerawang over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.3% in Wallerawang and 1.6% in Tinonee, so landlords in Wallerawang face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wallerawang is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,019 against 1,202, larger than Tinonee; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tinonee for rental income, Wallerawang for recent price momentum, Wallerawang for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison