Skip to main content

Tivoli vs Yungaburra

Property investment comparison - Tivoli, QLD 4305 vs Yungaburra, QLD 4884

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Tivoli wins 6, Yungaburra wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricTivoliYungaburra
Median house price$790K$795K
Median unit price$710K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.91%3.80%
Gross rental yield (units)4.02%2.00%
1-year house growth+19.3%+13.5%
3-year house growth+76.2%+31.0%
Vacancy rate0.8%2.0%
Population1,4601,272

Tivoli vs Yungaburra: what the numbers say

The median house price is $790K in Tivoli and $795K in Yungaburra, so Tivoli is the cheaper entry point, with Yungaburra houses about 1% dearer.

On cash flow, Tivoli leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.91%, compared with 3.80% in Yungaburra, a gap of 0.11 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +19.3% in Tivoli and +13.5% in Yungaburra, so recent momentum favours Tivoli, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Tivoli houses are +76.2% and Yungaburra houses +31.0%, so Tivoli has compounded faster than Yungaburra over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Tivoli and 2.0% in Yungaburra, so landlords in Tivoli face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Tivoli is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,460 against 1,272, larger than Yungaburra; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Tivoli for rental income, Tivoli for a lower purchase price, Tivoli for recent price momentum, Tivoli for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison