Skip to main content

Toodyay vs Usher

Property investment comparison - Toodyay, WA 6566 vs Usher, WA 6230

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Toodyay wins 3, Usher wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricToodyayUsher
Median house price$630K$640K
Median unit price$285K$370K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.55%5.00%
Gross rental yield (units)3.95%7.87%
1-year house growth-+15.6%estimate
3-year house growth+62.2%-
Vacancy rate0.7%0.7%
Population1,3622,137

Toodyay vs Usher: what the numbers say

The median house price is $630K in Toodyay and $640K in Usher, so Toodyay is the cheaper entry point, with Usher houses about 2% dearer.

For units, Toodyay sits at a median of $285K against $370K in Usher, which makes Toodyay the more affordable unit market and Usher the pricier one.

On cash flow, Usher leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.00%, compared with 4.55% in Toodyay, a gap of 0.45 percentage points.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Toodyay and 0.7% in Usher, so landlords in Toodyay face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Usher is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,137 against 1,362, larger than Toodyay; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Usher for rental income, Toodyay for a lower purchase price, Toodyay for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison