Tootgarook vs Werneth
Property investment comparison - Tootgarook, VIC 3941 vs Werneth, VIC 3352
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Tootgarook wins 2, Werneth wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Tootgarook | Werneth |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $885K | $885K |
| Median unit price | - | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.44% | 2.54% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.80% | - |
| 1-year house growth | -0.7%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 1.5% | 1.9% |
| Population | 3,178 | 66 |
Tootgarook vs Werneth: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $885K in Tootgarook and $885K in Werneth.
On cash flow, Tootgarook leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.44%, compared with 2.54% in Werneth, a gap of 0.90 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Tootgarook and 1.9% in Werneth, so landlords in Tootgarook face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Tootgarook is the bigger suburb, with a population of 3,178 against 66, roughly 48 times the size of Werneth; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Tootgarook for rental income, Tootgarook for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison