Trinity Park vs Urangan
Property investment comparison - Trinity Park, QLD 4879 vs Urangan, QLD 4655
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Trinity Park wins 2, Urangan wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Trinity Park | Urangan |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $815K | $815K |
| Median unit price | - | $605K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 4.80% | 3.95% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 4.33% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +13.2%estimate | +14.1% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +31.5% |
| Vacancy rate | 1.3% | 1.3% |
| Population | 3,536 | 10,988 |
Trinity Park vs Urangan: what the numbers say
Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $815K in Trinity Park and $815K in Urangan.
On cash flow, Trinity Park leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.80%, compared with 3.95% in Urangan, a gap of 0.85 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +13.2% in Trinity Park (an estimate) and +14.1% in Urangan, so recent momentum favours Urangan, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 1.3%.
Urangan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 10,988 against 3,536, roughly 3.1 times the size of Trinity Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Trinity Park for rental income, Urangan for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison