Skip to main content

Trundle vs Whitton

Property investment comparison - Trundle, NSW 2875 vs Whitton, NSW 2705

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Trundle wins 4, Whitton wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricTrundleWhitton
Median house price$270K$230K
Median unit price$420K$325K
Gross rental yield (houses)5.08%5.05%
Gross rental yield (units)6.06%4.84%
1-year house growth+3.1%estimate-2.0%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate1.1%9.8%
Population568523

Trundle vs Whitton: what the numbers say

The median house price is $270K in Trundle and $230K in Whitton, so Whitton is the cheaper entry point, with Trundle houses about 17% dearer.

For units, Trundle sits at a median of $420K against $325K in Whitton, which makes Whitton the more affordable unit market and Trundle the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 5.08% in Trundle and 5.05% in Whitton, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Over the past year house prices moved +3.1% in Trundle (an estimate) and -2.0% in Whitton (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Trundle, while Whitton went backwards.

Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Trundle and 9.8% in Whitton, so landlords in Trundle face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Trundle is the bigger suburb, with a population of 568 against 523, larger than Whitton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Whitton for a lower purchase price, Trundle for recent price momentum, Trundle for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison