Skip to main content

Uki vs Wyongah

Property investment comparison - Uki, NSW 2484 vs Wyongah, NSW 2259

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Uki wins 3, Wyongah wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricUkiWyongah
Median house price$945K$945K
Median unit price$580K-
Gross rental yield (houses)4.81%3.86%
Gross rental yield (units)6.29%4.46%
1-year house growth+12.0%+14.5%estimate
3-year house growth+18.6%-
Vacancy rate1.8%2.5%
Population6852,020

Uki vs Wyongah: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $945K in Uki and $945K in Wyongah.

On cash flow, Uki leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.81%, compared with 3.86% in Wyongah, a gap of 0.95 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +12.0% in Uki and +14.5% in Wyongah (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Wyongah, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Uki and 2.5% in Wyongah, so landlords in Uki face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wyongah is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,020 against 685, roughly 2.9 times the size of Uki; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Uki for rental income, Wyongah for recent price momentum, Uki for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison