Skip to main content

Uranquinty vs Wattle

Property investment comparison - Uranquinty, NSW 2652 vs Wattle, NSW 2795

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Uranquinty wins 0, Wattle wins 5. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricUranquintyWattle
Median house price$605K$600K
Median unit price$880K$450K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.38%4.43%
Gross rental yield (units)4.27%5.34%
1-year house growth+14.9%-
3-year house growth+57.6%-
Vacancy rate2.0%0.8%
Population91012,169

Uranquinty vs Wattle: what the numbers say

The median house price is $605K in Uranquinty and $600K in Wattle, so Wattle is the cheaper entry point, with Uranquinty houses about 1% dearer.

For units, Uranquinty sits at a median of $880K against $450K in Wattle, which makes Wattle the more affordable unit market and Uranquinty the pricier one.

Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 4.38% in Uranquinty and 4.43% in Wattle, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Wattle and 2.0% in Uranquinty, so landlords in Wattle face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Wattle is the bigger suburb, with a population of 12,169 against 910, roughly 13 times the size of Uranquinty; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wattle for a lower purchase price, Wattle for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison