Skip to main content

Voyager Point vs Woronora Heights

Property investment comparison - Voyager Point, NSW 2172 vs Woronora Heights, NSW 2233

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Voyager Point wins 3, Woronora Heights wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricVoyager PointWoronora Heights
Median house price$1.7M$1.7M
Median unit price$1.3M-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.40%3.57%
Gross rental yield (units)-5.16%
1-year house growth+8.3%estimate+1.8%estimate
3-year house growth--
Vacancy rate0.8%2.6%
Population1,6782,781

Voyager Point vs Woronora Heights: what the numbers say

The median house price is $1.7M in Voyager Point and $1.7M in Woronora Heights, so Voyager Point is the cheaper entry point.

On cash flow, Woronora Heights leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.57%, compared with 3.40% in Voyager Point, a gap of 0.17 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +8.3% in Voyager Point (an estimate) and +1.8% in Woronora Heights (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Voyager Point, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Voyager Point and 2.6% in Woronora Heights, so landlords in Voyager Point face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Woronora Heights is the bigger suburb, with a population of 2,781 against 1,678, larger than Voyager Point; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Woronora Heights for rental income, Voyager Point for a lower purchase price, Voyager Point for recent price momentum, Voyager Point for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison