Skip to main content

Waikiki vs Wellard

Property investment comparison - Waikiki, WA 6169 vs Wellard, WA 6170

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Waikiki wins 0, Wellard wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricWaikikiWellard
Median house price$840K$840K
Median unit price$620K$585K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.10%4.54%
Gross rental yield (units)--
1-year house growth+20.1%estimate+20.4%
3-year house growth-+75.6%
Vacancy rate2.1%2.0%
Population12,45314,127

Waikiki vs Wellard: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $840K in Waikiki and $840K in Wellard.

For units, Waikiki sits at a median of $620K against $585K in Wellard, which makes Wellard the more affordable unit market and Waikiki the pricier one.

On cash flow, Wellard leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.54%, compared with 4.10% in Waikiki, a gap of 0.44 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +20.1% in Waikiki (an estimate) and +20.4% in Wellard, so recent momentum favours Wellard, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 2.1%.

Wellard is the bigger suburb, with a population of 14,127 against 12,453, larger than Waikiki; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Wellard for rental income, Wellard for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison