Skip to main content

Wallan vs Winter Valley

Property investment comparison - Wallan, VIC 3756 vs Winter Valley, VIC 3358

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Wallan wins 3, Winter Valley wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricWallanWinter Valley
Median house price$620K$620K
Median unit price$465K$565K
Gross rental yield (houses)4.00%-
Gross rental yield (units)4.77%3.01%
1-year house growth+0.0%+10.7%
3-year house growth-0.8%+3.4%
Vacancy rate2.1%8.1%
Population15,0043,440

Wallan vs Winter Valley: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $620K in Wallan and $620K in Winter Valley.

For units, Wallan sits at a median of $465K against $565K in Winter Valley, which makes Wallan the more affordable unit market and Winter Valley the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +0.0% in Wallan and +10.7% in Winter Valley, so recent momentum favours Winter Valley, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Wallan houses are -0.8% and Winter Valley houses +3.4%, so Winter Valley has compounded faster than Wallan over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 2.1% in Wallan and 8.1% in Winter Valley, so landlords in Wallan face less competition for tenants.

Wallan is the bigger suburb, with a population of 15,004 against 3,440, roughly 4.4 times the size of Winter Valley; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Winter Valley for recent price momentum, Wallan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison